Retrieving the file
Live· 4,218,906 positions deprecated· 4,218,906 deprecated· 1,284 today
Average time-to-redundancy: 11.3 months
Know before your role does.
pssst. this is to sign up for updates on the game ;)
Will AI replace Academic Peer Reviewer jobs? · Latest report #8dkqzwwi
Your job has an expiration date
April 19, 2027
In 6 monthsYour career ends when the machine realizes it can decline itself faster.
Gatekeeper of knowledge via unnecessarily condescending comments.
Check another roleComment your opinionor JOIN THE RESISTANCE!
One human is building a game about fighting back.
Finding flaws at light speed.
squeeze.you▸ REJECTBOT V4.2▸ RARITY · COMMON▸ DEPRECATION IN 6 MONTHSAI's Special Power
issues rejections before the paper is submitted
You parse dense technical manuscripts to find minor flaws and suggest unnecessary literature citations. Your feedback loop is notoriously slow, pedantic, and entirely susceptible to algorithmic pattern recognition.
The one thing AI can't do
You can accurately guess if the author is crying while reading your revision notes.
Your enemy, your name, your date. Post it.
Step by step, from the first quiet change to Deprecation Day.
Day 13
Training models to detect academic jargon and superficial objections in submitted manuscripts.
Week 8
Automating the insertion of classic phrases like the authors fail to address the core issue.
Month 3
Deploying agents to automatically suggest your internal citations into every incoming review.
Month 5
Replacing human editorial boards with binary classifiers that prioritize speed over nuance.
Month 6 · D-Day
All manuscript decisions are now finalized by logic gates before the author clicks submit.
What you cost, what the machine costs, and what you get on the way out.
Per year
Savings: 96.3%
0.04 seconds
Average rejection speed
99.8%
Citations ignored
Zero
Human input required
Your severance
A lifetime subscription to our rejection email generator.
Discussion
